The Christian Heritage Centre

Categories
Blog Media

“God from God, light from Light…”

8 May 2025

"God of God, light of light, true God of true God..."
Nicea, Relation and Generation

By Stefan Kaminski

In the two previous posts, we have looked at the nature of God as Creator, and followed this with Nicea’s opening statement about the Son. We now pick up with the next statement that Nicea makes about Jesus Christ, namely the triple formulation describing the generation of the Son by the Father.

The words of the Creed speak not just of a divine truth, but they also outline the archetype of our own, personal reality. At the heart of the Creed, in its substance and in its very structure, is this central truth about relationality. The Creed, we might say, is a formula of relationship: moving through the three persons of the Trinity and so to the Church, which is a consequence of the Trinitarian Love.

The line that we are presented with above essentially has one purpose: to affirm the full equalness of the Son – of the person, Jesus Christ – to the Father. The Father and the Son are equal in substance (i.e. in being “God”) and therefore in divine dignity. This sameness of being also means that the Son exists eternally, just like the Father.

The difference between God the Father and God the Son is in their way of relating. In the person of the Father, we see the “superabundant fullness of God” (International Theological Commission, Jesus Christ, Son of God, Saviour): a superabundance that gives everything, including His own being, and in doing so constitutes Himself as Father.

The Son is thus most essentially defined as the recipient of this superabundance – of the Father’s Love. However, differently from the process of generating any other being, the Divine begetting is something that happens eternally, that is not within time. In other words, there was never a ‘time’ when there was only the Father, and no Son.

Obviously, thinking about this begins to hurt our heads, which are limited by the constraints of time and space. To help us out, Nicea introduced the phrase “light from light” as a way of illustrating this. At the time, it was thought that light was instantaneous – there was no concept of it as a particle or a wave that had to travel – even though it was understood that light emanated from the sun. So the light hitting the earth was thought to be simultaneous to the light ‘leaving’ the sun. This was seen as a helpful analogy for the Son being generated by the Father, not in time, but as an eternally-standing reality.

Guido Reni, The Holy Trinity

In formulating its symbol, the Council of Nicea wished not so much to focus on the monotheistic aspect of the Christian faith, but precisely on this Christian novelty of the paternity, the generation, that exists within the Trinity, and that substantiates and gives shape to the claim that “God is Love” (1 John 4:8).

The external action of God in creating the world – and specifically us – thus takes on an entirely new context and significance as the extension, or fruit, of this original Love. Christ enters this world not as one aloof, or as a different species or as a visitor, but takes on the human body prepared for Him by His Father (cf. Hebrews 10:5), precisely because the logic of the intra-Trinitarian Love is one and the same as that which overflows into the creation by the Trinity of all that exists.

In that creation, humanity has a privileged place as children of God, and it is to these wayward chilren that the Son comes to reveal the fullness of God’s Love. In taking flesh, the Son re-united the Divine and the human, and revealed to man what was hidden from his sight: namely Him in whose image we are made. In doing so, Christ therefore also “fully reveals man to himself” (Gaudium et Spes, 22) by showing us the Father from whom we come.

The above Nicean formula should thus be at the back of our minds when we hear Christ say, “no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him” (Mt 11:27). The Son reveals the Father because He is the first fruit of the Father, and the full recipient of His Love. We, in turn, have access to the Father as sons through Christ. Our relationship to Christ thus finds a two-fold dynamic: a filial relation, insofar as Christ generated us for new life by giving His own self; and a relation as His brothers and sisters, insfoar as we have been adopted by the Father as sons through Christ (cf. Ephesians 1:5).

Andrej Rublev's Trinity

it is in this wonderful exchange of Love that we, as individuals but very much neither autonomous nor isolated, find our identity: firstly as children, in order to then be able to give of ourselves in turn.

Categories
Blog Media

“and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father…”

10 April 2025

"And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father..."
Passiontide, Nicea and the Jubilee

By Stefan Kaminski

In the last post, we considered the opening statement of Nicea’s formulation: the foundation of the whole Christian faith in the absolute omnipotence and benevolence of God. But it is in the statement above that follows, that Nicea reveals its principle interest: a firm – and blasphemous, to many – affirmation of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

In this statement, Jesus’ name is bracketed by two expressions: “one Lord” and “the only begotten of the Father”.

The first of these – “one Lord” – firmly grounds us in the Divinity revealed by the Old Testament. The Latin term dominus is a rendering of the Greek kyrios, which in turn is a strict translation of the Hebrew, adonai. Kyrios is also used in the Greek Old Testament as equivalent for the divine name of Yahweh, thus appearing some 9,000 times in total throughout the Septuagint.

A bit like the statement of Jesus that so provoked the Pharisees and Scribes in today’s Gospel reading (“Before Abraham ever was, I AM”, Jn 8:58), designating Christ as kyrios – Lord – is a clear claim of the divine nature of His Person.

The second phrase adds further light to this, moving from a pre-Christian grasp of monotheism to the full mystery of a God who is Love. In the begetting of the Son by the Father and the expression of this bond in the Holy Spirit, the very essence and goal of our personhood – our relationality – is revealed. This is the sublime communion of Love that we are made by (“in the image of God He created him”, Gn 1:27) and for (“Behold, the dwelling of God is with men… and God Himself will be with them”, Rev. 21:3).

Moses and the Burning Bush, by Raphael

The coming of God as man is precisely what the Jubilee Year commemorates. Originally intended as a centenary celebration of the Incarnation by Pope Boniface VII, who inaugurated it in 1300, the interval between Jubilee years underwent several changes before being settled at 25 years by Pope Paul II, and thus it has remained since the Holy Year of 1475.

However, neither is the high Middle Ages the real reference point. Once again, we need return to the very incarnate nature of the convenantal relationship instituted by God, of which Christ is the fulfilment and final word.

The Jubilee Year is an institution decreed by the Lord God to the Israelite people, and codified in the Book of Leviticus.

The year of Jubilee marked the end of the seventh cycle of seven years (i.e. the fiftieth year) – a symbol of the perfection of God’s work. As such, it was a year of joy and of universal pardon: “Thou shalt sanctify the fiftieth year, and shalt proclaim remission to all the inhabitants of thy land: for it is the year of jubilee” (Leviticus 25:10). By this year, all debts were to have been written off, and every man free to return to his home and retake possession of his land. As a time of rest from labour and reliance on the Lord’s Providence, it was also an opportunity to allow the land to recover from agricultural use.

The coming of God Himself, with the full revelation of the Son by the Father (“This is my beloved Son”, Mt 3:17) and of the Father by the Son (“if you knew me, you would know my Father also”, Jn 14:7), constitutes the perfection – the ‘fiftieth year’ – of God’s work, and is the only source of true joy and pardon.

Thus, the Jubilee Year takes on a particular significance as we approach the mystery of our salvation – the end for which God became man, and the culmination of the liturgical year. During the Passiontide of a Holy Year, we not only commemorate the coming together of Priest and Victim in the Paschal Triduum, but the Church offers further opportunities to claim the full effect of this saving Sacrifice.

Categories
Blog Media

“We believe in one God the Father Almighty”

15 March 2025

"We believe in one God the Father Almighty, maker of all things..."
Commemorating the 1,700th anniversary of Nicea

By Stefan Kaminski

This is the opening statement of the symbol of the Church’s first Ecumenical Council, convened in Nicea in 325 A.D. by Emperor Constantine, in concert with Pope Sylvester I. For the last 1,700 years, Christians have repeated these words to signify their participation in the ecclesial communion as believing members.

Perhaps no statement in the Creed is more fundamental than this one, at the level of establishing the horizon and backdrop of our thinking and imagination. This foundational belief sets the intellectual scene for the way we perceive reality: the world around us, other people and ourselves.

Commentators such as Mgr James Shea, President of the University of Mary in the US, rightly interrogate the basic intellectual framework that underpins contemporary Western society. Mgr Shea contends that we are essentially back in an “Apostolic era”, rather than a Christian one, as society’s collective imagination does not any longer operate on the foundations of a Creator and Redeemer God. Christianity today, he suggests, is facing a challenge not dissimilar to that of the early Church. Our belief in “one God, the Almighty Father” is in many ways no less counter-cultural in a secular, pluralistic society than it was in the pagan, pantheistic one of Rome.

The only difference is that today, theoretically, Christianity is a public point of reference and a large proportion of the population express some sort of belief in God, with a significant minority still professing a Christian belief. However, practically-speaking, religious faith is often seen as a private matter of subjective belief which has no place for expression in public life.

The opening of the Nicene Symbol is a powerful reminder that the very opposite is true. At the heart of Nicea’s first statement is the all-encompassing and creative power of the Father. This power is not to be understood in the common sense of ‘power over something’ or ‘power to do something specific’; rather, it is absolute power, within which all existence resides.

The radicality of this is easy to miss. To “create”, as spoken of in Genesis 1 and intended by the Nicene Creed, is “to call into being from non-being, from nothingness” (St John Paul II). God’s creation consists of willing everything that exists outside of Him, to be. It is this that the Church intends by “omnipotent” or “almighty”.

The rest of our Christian vision cascades from this starting point. If God is the only Being that is (“I am who I am”, Exodus 3:14), then everything that is created receives its being from God – or better still, receives being from God. Put differently, if the act of being belongs only to God, then all things and creatures are and continue to be by virtue of God’s will: “For he spoke, and it came to be” (Ps 33:9).

This has a profound consequence for our understanding of things in themselves. God, Who is Good, only creates and wills what is good. Thus, all things are good in their existence and in the way that they are intended by God. Nothing that exists can be said to be evil or wrong in the fact of its being and its being intended by God in a particular way. It is only when we redirect the purpose of something, starting with ourselves (Satan being the example par excellence), thereby detracting from God’s intention, that evil enters the equation.

It is thus that we can perhaps make sense of Jesus’ words, “Be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). Christ Himself is the Incarnation of this perfection, and the fact that God the Son gave Divine perfection human form tells us how high an intention and end God has for us.

Detail from the Sistine Chapel ceiling, by Michelangelo